Complaint Form
Complaint handling template
Complaint Form for medical device complaint and vigilance management
Use this editable Complaint to capture, evaluate, investigate and close complaints with traceable decisions and clear reporting routes.
- Best for: complaint handling, vigilance reporting, PMS data capture and trend analysis.
- Includes: editable sections for complaint intake, evaluation, investigation, closure and reporting.
- Format: editable template available through the standard WooCommerce download flow.
Lexqara supports manufacturers in turning complaint data into actionable PMS insights while meeting MDR vigilance obligations. Explore the Resource Center or review our Post-Market Surveillance Services.
Description:
This Complaint form captures, evaluates, investigates, and closes complaints with traceable decisions and documented actions.
-
Record Awareness date and Complaint initiation date for timeline control.
-
Capture Device range involved and Traceability including UDI, model, and lot/serial.
-
Perform Complaint Evaluation (yes/no criteria) with written Justification.
-
Document Complaint Reporting to Authorities and link SOP-VIG-001 for Europe.
-
Record Complaint Investigation (DHF/DHR/DMR/QMS, testing) and conclusion.
-
Complete Risk Estimation against the Risk Management File and decide on CAPA.
-
Document Corrections and Response to the complainant with responsibilities and dates.
Your needs:
-
Medical device complaint form
-
Medical device complaint form for ISO 13485, MDR compliance.
-
Reduce rework, protect vigilance timelines, and strengthen audit readiness.
Use this form whenever a complaint is received to ensure intake, evaluation, investigation, and closure are consistently documented and traceable under EU complaint handling and vigilance expectations.
It consolidates the evidence trail. Awareness date anchors regulatory timelines; it matters because late escalation creates reporting risk. Traceability (UDI/lot/serial) links the issue to affected devices; it matters because it supports containment and trend review.
-
Capture complainant details and complaint description.
-
Record device identifiers and traceability fields.
-
Apply complaint criteria with justification and conclusion.
-
Assess reportability for Europe and attach vigilance decision records.
-
Plan and document investigation steps and outcomes.
-
Perform risk estimation and justify CAPA decisions.
-
Record corrections, communications, and closure approvals.
At Lexqara, we align complaint files with PMS workflows, CAPA linkage, and inspection-ready documentation—supported by training and practical templates. Resource Center [https://lexqara.com/resource-center] and Post-Market Surveillance support [https://lexqara.com/services/post-market-surveillance]. EU MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745) [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj]. Download the template or request a short gap assessment.
Template preview
Template preview: Complaint
Review the key sections included in the Complaint template before downloading it. This preview shows the structure and content you will receive in the editable file.
View the full template preview
Complainant Details
|
Name: |
|
|
Adress: |
|
|
Phone number: |
|
|
Email: |
Complaint Details
|
Awareness date: |
[DD-Mon-YYYY] |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Complaint initiation date: |
[DD-Mon-YYYY] |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Description of the complaint |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Full description of the complaint |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Device range involved: |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Traceability |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
History of exchanges |
[DD-Mon-YYYY] |
Description of the exchanges / indicate the dates of emails sent when no responses are received. / emails can be attached in Attachment A-X |
||||||||||||||||
|
[DD-Mon-YYYY] |
Description of the exchanges / indicate the dates of emails sent when no responses are received. / emails can be attached in Attachment A-X |
|||||||||||||||||
Complaint Evaluation
If one “yes” is selected, the event meets the definition of complaint[1]
|
Name |
Date |
||||
|
Was the event due to a device malfunction or device deterioration in the device characteristics or performance? |
Yes No |
||||
|
Was the event an use-error due to ergonomic features? |
Yes No |
||||
|
Was the event due to an inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer? e.g., IFU, labels, identification, traceability |
Yes No |
||||
|
Did the event lead to undesirable side-effects or injuries? |
Yes No |
||||
|
Was the event related to a service that affected the device characteristics or performance? FOR DEVICES REQUIRING SERVICING (or remove) |
Yes No |
||||
|
Did the event lead to a harm as a consequence of a medical decision, action taken or not taken on the basis of information or result(s) provided by the device. FOR IVD (or remove) |
Yes No |
||||
|
Justification |
|||||
|
Describe in detail when the event is not considered as a complaint or N/A |
|||||
|
Conclusion |
|||||
|
The event does not meet the definition of complaint. The next sections are not applicable, and the complaint can be closed after a response has been sent to the complainant (see below) The event meets the definition of complaint. |
|||||
Complaint Reporting to Authorities
|
Name |
Date |
|||||||||||||
|
Country |
Initial Reporting Criteria |
Applicable |
Conclusion* |
|||||||||||
|
Europe |
Did the event occur in Europe? |
Yes |
Complete SOP-VIG-001 |
|||||||||||
|
No |
Not reportable – trend |
|||||||||||||
|
Date of reporting to authorities: Applicable Non-Applicable |
[Or N/A] |
|||||||||||||
*Supporting evidence are in Appendix B-X of the document.
Complaint Investigation
|
Name |
Date |
||||||||
|
Need of investigation? |
|||||||||
|
Yes No |
Justification when no investigation is required: e.g., recurrent issue with problem already known |
||||||||
|
Has(ve) the device(s) been returned? |
Yes No |
||||||||
|
Detailed investigation |
|||||||||
|
Assessment |
Applicable? |
Description |
Complete? |
||||||
|
DHF documents |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
DHR documents |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
DMR documents |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
QMS documents |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
Suppliers / Subcontractors |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
Test of the device involved |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
Additional tests |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
… (others) |
Yes No |
Include a justification if “No” Complete the investigation with a complete description and with reference to records generated (to be included in Attachment A-X) |
Yes |
||||||
|
Has a field safety issue been identified? |
|||||||||
|
No, no field safety risk identified |
Yes, the complaint may require a FSCA: |
HHE: [HHEYYYY-XXX] |
|||||||
|
Conclusion of the investigation |
|||||||||
|
Following the investigation, the complaint cannot be confirmed as:
Following the investigation, the complaint has been confirmed, and the following summarizes the cause(s) identified:
|
|||||||||
Risk Estimation & Corrective Actions
|
N/A, the complaint cannot be confirmed, and the investigation cannot conclude on the cause. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk Management File: |
[Doc+rev] |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Identified risks: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need of CAPA? |
Yes |
CAPAYYYY-XXX |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
No |
Include a justification based on the risk estimation consistent with the risk management file / CAPA already initiated for the same problem (CAPAYYYY-XXX) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Corrections
|
Action with the complainant |
Responsible |
Date |
Record |
|
Possible actions: exchange, servicing, etc. |
|||
|
Response to the complainant |
Corrective Actions
|
Name |
Date |
|||
|
Need of CAPA? |
Yes |
CAPAYYYY-XXX |
||
|
No |
Include a justification based on the risk estimation consistent with the risk management file / CAPA already initiated for the same problem (CAPAYYYY-XXX) |
|||
Approval
|
intermediary |
Closure |
||
|
Name |
Signature |
||
|
Position |
|||
|
Date |
|||
List of Attachments
|
Description |
Attachment A-X |
|---|---|
|
Reporting of complaints |
Attachment B-X |
|---|---|
|
SOP-VIG-001 – MDR vigilance instruction |
|
Attachment A-1
Attachment B-X
-
The term “complaint”, as defined in ISO13485, may be referred differently under applicable regulatory requirements (e.g., “incident” under MDR/IVDR). However, the criteria defined under “complaint” encompass all regulatory requirements within scope of [Company Name]’s quality management system. ↑
The complete template content is displayed above. The editable file is available after adding the product to cart.
Related Complaint handling templates
Strengthen your complaint handling documentation with related templates from the same process.
Need expert support? Explore Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) & PMCF Services for Medical Devices | Lexqara.
Free