Design Review Form

Design control template

Design Review Form for medical device design controls

Use this editable Design Review to run phase-gated design controls, keep your Design History File (DHF) complete, and demonstrate that your device was developed under controlled requirements.

Trace requirements to validationLink user needs, design inputs, outputs, V&V and transfer.
Support DHF integrityDocument reviews, changes and design transfer in one controlled flow.
Ready for FDA/MDR auditsAlign with 21 CFR 820.30 and MDR Annex I expectations.

  • Best for: DHF management, design planning, V&V evidence capture, design review and change control.
  • Includes: editable sections for inputs, outputs, planning, reviews, transfer, changes and V&V records.
  • Format: editable template available through the standard WooCommerce download flow.
Need the editable file?
Add the free template to cart

Lexqara helps medical device manufacturers build robust design controls that satisfy both FDA QSR and EU MDR requirements. Explore the Resource Center or review our Design Control Services.

Description:

This document supports a controlled, documented design review to confirm phase deliverables are complete, suitable, and ready for the next decision.
• Identify Review type (phase-gate, design change, or additional review) and the project Phase.
• Record Project Name, DHF Number, and the Date of Design Review for traceability.
• Link key references: Design and Development Planning, Traceability Matrix, and applicable DHF revision.
• Define Participants (required/optional) and include an Independent Reviewer where applicable.
• Review the previous Action plan with closure evidence and suitability conclusion.
• Assess phase deliverables for Approved status and Suitability, with a proposed action plan when “No”.
• Capture the final decision (Go / Go with action / On hold / Stop) with rationale and an action list.

Your needs:

medical device design review aligned with ISO 13485 requirements
• medical device design review for MDR decision-making
• Reduce rework by locking clear actions, owners, and evidence before moving phases.

Use this form before moving to the next development phase, after compiling updated deliverables and identifying any open risks, gaps, or pending changes to be reviewed and approved.

It helps standardize expectations for review readiness. Suitability means the deliverable is adequate for the phase and can support progression, and an Action plan assigns ownership and deadlines so gaps are closed with evidence.
• Confirm review scope, boundaries, and references are complete.
• Verify attendee roles, presence, and independence as required.
• Evaluate deliverables, approval status, and documented comments.
• Record additional discussions, issues to mitigate, and actions.
• Conclude with a clear go/no-go decision and blocking actions.

Within Lexqara, we help align DHF evidence, and run pragmatic design control check-ins so decisions are defensible during audits and inspections. See our Resource Center and our Design Control Support for Start-up Companies, and benchmark expectations via FDA Design Controls guidance. Request a short design review readiness check.

Consistent use of this template improves phase-gate discipline, keeps design changes transparent, and strengthens traceability from planning to action closure.

Template preview

Template preview: Design Review

Review the key sections included in the Design Review template before downloading it. This preview shows the structure and content you will receive in the editable file.

View the full template preview

Project Name: XXXX

DHF Number: XXXX

Scope

This document is used to prepare, conduct, document, and approve the design review for the design and development of [Device Name].

Design Review Identification

Review type

Phase-gate review Design change review

Additional review

Phase

Phase 1 – Feasibility / Phase 2 – Design / Phase 3 – Development / Phase 4 – Industrialization / Phase 5 – Market Launch / N/A Select the appropriate phase

Objective and scope of review

State the purpose of the review and the boundaries of what is being assessed.

Date of Design Review

DD-Month-YYYY

Design and Development Planning reference

ZZZZ-PL-XXX rev.Y Enter the applicable D&D Plan reference and revision. Indicate N/A if in Phase 1.

Traceability Matrix

ZZZZ-TM-XXX rev.Y Enter the applicable Traceability Matrix reference and revision. Indicate N/A if in Phase 1.

DHF number

ZZZZ-DHF rev.Y Enter the applicable DHF number and revision.

Participants

Indicate the individuals required (present or the back-up) and optional individuals present during the design review as referenced in the D&D Planning

Name

Position

Required / Optional

Presence

Project Manager

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Independent Reviewer

Required Optional

Present

Back-up

Previous Design Review Action Plan

Action plan

Date of closure

Evidence

Is the action complete and suitable?

Consider the pending actions from the last design review

XX-Mon-YYYY

Indicate the document number and revision

Yes

No: XXX indicate the conclusions and necessary actions.

Design Review Meeting

Documentation review

The document list below represents the deliverables created or updated during the phase under assessment with their analysis during the design review meeting by the participants.

Design Review Preparation

Design Review Meeting

Document Type

Document number and revision

Document title

Required

Approved

Comments

Suitability[1]

If “No”, Proposed Action Plan

At least include the document type required in Section 5.2.6 of the design control procedure.

Indicate all documents generated or updated during the phase.

Indicate the corresponding document title

Yes

No

Yes

No

Identify any gap, problem, risks identified with the justification if acceptable.

Yes

No

Indicate “-” if not applicable. Where applicable, describe the action plan agreed during the design review meeting and provide a justification if the issue does not prevent progression to the next phase.

Additional Discussions During the Design Review Meeting

Summary of the discussion

Any issue to be mitigated?

Proposed action plan

Indicate the summary of important adhoc discussion with the conclusion

Yes No

If a problem must be addressed, indicate the action plan

Yes No

Design Change Assessment

Include the design change number and its description with the status of the change. The conclusion is based on the change status. If the design change is approved, the design review can be performed, if the change is not finalized or under reassessment, the design review is on hold, if the change is cancelled and the project is cancelled, then the design review needs to be cancelled.

Design Change Number

Change Description

Status of the Change

Conclusion

Change approved

Change not finalized

Change under reassessment

Change is cancelled

The design review can be performed

The design review is on hold

The design review is cancelled

Conclusion and Decision from Design Review

Summary of assessment

Assessment

Conclusion

The outputs of the current stage are complete, adequate, approved, compliant with applicable quality and regulatory requirements.

Yes

No, but no significant concern raised

No, with significant concern raised

#

Summary of gaps identified:

![2]

Corresponding action plan:

Action list

Who?

Due date

1

XXX List all gaps, problems, risks previously identified with a “No” in Suitability

XXX Describe the corresponding action plan

XX

XX-Mon-YYYY

2

3

Conclusion

Tick the box corresponding to the final decision and include below the associated justification.

Go

The design may proceed to the next stage.

Go with action

The design may proceed subject to completion of defined actions within agreed timelines.

On hold

Progression is suspended pending completion of required actions or resolution of identified issues.

Stop

The project or design stage is discontinued.

Rationale for the decision

Indicate a summary of the reason for the decision above (with especially the list of action items blocking the progression of the design review in the current phase)

Approval

Revision

Date

Change History

Approval

Name

Position

Date

Signature

Approval

Name

Position

Date

Signature

Approval

Name

Position

Date

Signature

Approval

Name

Position

Date

Signature

Approval

Name

Position

Date

Signature

  1. Suitable means: complete, adequate, compliant with regulatory requirements.

  2. When an action must be completed before moving to the next phase, it shall be marked with “!”. If completion of the action is not required for progression to the next phase, it shall be marked with “-”.

The complete template content is displayed above. The editable file is available after adding the product to cart.

Free

View Cart